Front Lines of the Battle Against Covid-19

March 27, 2020

“Operation Enduring Freedom”, “Operation Resolute Support”, “Operation New Dawn”, “Operation Unified Protector”, “Operation Decisive Storm”, to name a few, were recent decades’ ambitiously titled military interventions seeking to achieve narrow ends. Although diplomacy and multilateralism were sidelined, they all claimed to have the support of the so-called “international community”. In reality, they only represented its failure.

The coronavirus is a slap in the face of the “international community”. It has instilled “shock and awe” across the globe. World leaders are struggling to contain the pandemic largely on their own terms. Their initial reactions have prioritized national interest as well as self-interest. Because, their political future matters. The UN Security Council remains invisible, perhaps also under lockdown. The World Health Organization offers advice and statistics, but it is not a global decision-making body.

Leaders of the world’s largest economies expressed confidence after a virtual G20 summit yesterday that they are strongly committed to presenting a united front against the common threat of coronavirus; that they will overcome the pandemic. However, their assurances failed to make headlines.

In brief, world’s immediate reaction to Covid-19 has been poor. To a certain extent this is only to be expected, even understandable but the current picture must change and must change soon if the phrase “international community” is not to prove a myth.

The pandemic appears to have pushed priority items of the global agenda way down the list. Now, it is all about fighting the virus and dealing with its economic impact. Pundits are looking beyond the horizon and speculating what sort of a new world order may emerge thereafter, who is to gain and who is to lose. Yet, current conflicts, particularly those in the Middle East have taken a dangerous new dimension with the spread of the disease. The “international community” does not have the luxury of forgetting about them.

Fighting is still going on in Syria, Libya and Yemen. Millions are displaced, without food, water and medical care. They are fighting for survival and in no mood to listen to advice regarding the combat against coronavirus. Unless countries which claim to lead the world ensure a broad Middle East ceasefire and provide urgent economic and humanitarian assistance, the pandemic will engulf tens and tens of thousands and those devastated regions will turn into impregnable coronavirus fortresses. Migration will become a worse problem.

Middle East countries are unable to face the challenge of the day on their own. Their administrations are opaque, undemocratic. Their economies are stagnant. Corruption is a major problem. Should coronavirus deaths and food prices skyrocket so will the crime rate. A new wave of internal violence will engulf the region.

It is time for the “international community” to admit that the regime change project in Syria has failed; one way or the other President Assad has won the war; and, any semblance of government authority is better than chaos.

The warring parties in Libya must be warned of coronavirus devastation if the fighting were not to stop. Saudi Arabia and its allies should withdraw from Yemen. External meddling in these conflicts must come to an end.

Western countries are worried about the spread of the disease at home but the front lines of defense against the coronavirus lie in conflict areas.

Turkey, reportedly, has 15,000 to 20,000 troops in Idlib. They are not only in harm’s way in a military sense but also sitting on top of a mountain which may soon prove a coronavirus volcano. The Turkish government which assumed a leading role in the regime change project in Syria must seriously consider negotiating the withdrawal of its troops from Idlib not only to end the continuing loss of its soldiers but also to escape what may prove more than a local a disaster. And, it should resume diplomatic dialogue with Damascus. These are extraordinary times which call for new approaches.

 

 

 

 

About Ali Tuygan

Ali Tuygan is a graduate of the Faculty of Political Sciences of Ankara University. He joined the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in January 1967. Between various positions he held in Ankara, he served at the Turkish Embassy in Brussels, NATO International Staff, Turkish Embassies in Washington and Baghdad and the Turkish Delegation to NATO. From 1986 to 1989 he was Principal Private Secretary to the President of the Republic. He then served as ambassador to Ottawa, Riyadh and Athens. In 1997 he was honored with a decoration by the Italian President. Between these assignments abroad he served twice as Deputy Undersecretary for Political Affairs. In 2004 he was appointed Undersecretary where he remained until the end of 2006 before going to his last foreign assignment as Ambassador to UNESCO. He retired in 2009. In April 2013 he published a book entitled “Gönüllü Diplomat, Dışişlerinde Kırk Yıl” (“Diplomat by Choice, Forty Years in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs”) in which he elaborated on the diplomatic profession and the main issues on the global agenda. He has published articles in Turkish periodicals and newspapers.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s